@HellerExposed U R as confident in Ur world view as I am in mine. Info about past, present & future global conditions will tell the tale
@LeonardCohen2 AGW advocates repeatedly claimed 97% scientists agreed with AGW claims.Not angry but they too called names. The 97% was bogus
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@LeonardCohen2 What do you think Dana? Do these trees matter to you? http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/27/world-heritage-forests-burn-as-global-tragedy-unfolds-in-tasmania … -
@HellerExposed such fires here often result from Rad Enviros preventing clearing of Forrest brush, leaving more combust able to ignite
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @HellerExposed Answer the question. Have you refuted the science of 179 institutes? It's all about the science. -
@LeonardCohen2@DanaRohrabacher I've found the congressman responds best when you hit him with a guilt trip. Somewhere he has a heart. -
@HellerExposed
@DanaRohrabacher As an Aussie I love the Tarkine Wilderness and the day it began to burn I did too. Fair call though, mate. -
@LeonardCohen2@DanaRohrabacher I was just reading about that not 10 minutes ago. Tragic. -
@HellerExposed
@DanaRohrabacher 50 uncontrolled fires in the hills + floods on the coast...those ancient peatbogs will burn awhile. -
@LeonardCohen2 fires no more frequent & often: Rad Enviros prevent Forrest thinning or brush removal, so small fires becomes huge -
@DanaRohrabacher @HellerExposed Here's the science. http://splash.abc.net.au/home#!/media/30033/climate-and-bushfires-in-australia … -
@DanaRohrabacher @HellerExposed Rad environmentalists? No. The Tarkine was isolated & wet. Never cleared. Only hikers went there.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.