@HellerExposed AGW appears fraudulent when specific objections to theory ignored, answered by dismissal, name calling or claim of consensus
@BryanKillett I don’t use the word liar & do not believe all scientists who disagree with me R liars. I believe there are such scientists
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Reagan's econ advisor: fighting AGW by reducing income tax & shifting to C doesn't hurt the economyhttps://vimeo.com/44472885 -
@BryanKillett so U’ve no admission U were wrong when you claimed I called U a”liar” & “fanatic”. So RU a scientist unable to admit mistakes -
@DanaRohrabacher So my tweet "indicates GWarming fanatics can’t think for themselves" but you didn't mean me. That's really your story? -
@DanaRohrabacher You accuse sci's of lying: http://dumbscientist.com/archives/abrupt-climate-change#comment-152753 … https://twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/6035807298 … https://twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/468399783569530880 … https://twitter.com/DanaRohrabacher/status/148636542498390016 …This Tweet is unavailable. -
@BryanKillett U claimed I called U a liar & fanatic. Now U can’t admit U were wrong. Guess there is a reason U thought I was referring to U -
@DanaRohrabacher I said U call "sci's" liars. Again, you said MY tweet indicates "fanatics". Too cowardly to own it?https://twitter.com/BryanKillett/status/676608022471303168 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Again, you've repeatedly accused scientists of lying dishonesty. Who are the liars, and is that why you ignore the US NAS?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.