@NJSnowFan No, I already LOL'd at his E&E "cred". Ignore all those sci orgs!
Seriously @DanaRohrabacher, Polyak ship data go before 1979.
-
-
@412V70 you don’t think suggesting that someone who disagrees with you is basing that disagreement on talking points is a personal jab?
-
@DanaRohrabacher No. Victim act might be more convincing if you hadn't implied I'm a fanatic: http://dumbscientist.com/archives/abrupt-climate-change#comment-152753 …pic.twitter.com/EtWTgwEpOm
-
Tweet unavailable
-
@412V70 Sadly not "all". This tweet has even more at bottom of link. (BTW, thanks for all the retweets and faves.)https://twitter.com/DumbSci/status/635910396566720512 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@DumbSci Dana is projecting again // He is the one parroting regurgitated warmed over talking points aka JabsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.