@DumbSci @DanaRohrabacher Oh You forgot about this..
Look closely..pic.twitter.com/iTboBsqQCh
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@DumbSci yep, agree 2 disagree,been wonderful discussion. Appreciate both sides, but how could Greenland been hotter before man made CO2?
@DanaRohrabacher Remember: cli sci's are the ones who discovered & named natural variations. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=6343229&cid=48576987 …pic.twitter.com/qV01lCZofk
@DumbSci I still remember the sincere advocates of Global Cooling back in the 70s. Russian scientists still believe long term cooling cycle
@DanaRohrabacher That's the spirit. Don't let facts get in the way of your talking points. http://dumbscientist.com/archives/abrupt-climate-change#comment-152737 …pic.twitter.com/0gbCaOmP2J
@DanaRohrabacher If you feel compelled to keep repeating that talking point, please read:
http://dumbscientist.com/archives/abrupt-climate-change#ice_age_prediction …pic.twitter.com/tXmUFBjqpv
@DumbSci I appreciate U countering my point with info.The talking point comment was a personal jab typical of AGW advocates¬ appreciated
@412V70 you don’t think suggesting that someone who disagrees with you is basing that disagreement on talking points is a personal jab?
@DanaRohrabacher No. Victim act might be more convincing if you hadn't implied I'm a fanatic: http://dumbscientist.com/archives/abrupt-climate-change#comment-152753 …pic.twitter.com/EtWTgwEpOm
@DanaRohrabacher That "wonderful discussion" was an attempt to distract from your incorrect claim about pre-1979 sea ice stats. Retract?
@DumbSci actually Chris Beale made that point after I noted stats U used only went back to 1979. Neal then challenged Ur basic proposition
@DanaRohrabacher You called it an "insight". By "challenge" you mean failing to grasp that his graph ends in 1855? Still deny pre-79 data?
@DanaRohrabacher, as vice chair of science committee you don't get to "agree to disagree" with the US NAS. They're supposed to advise you!
@DumbSci I thought U were suggesting that, or at least that’s what you said, so I thought I’d make the discussion a little less intense
@DanaRohrabacher If you could stop accusing NASA, NAS of fraud, that would make the discussion less intense. We might even have a future!
@DanaRohrabacher What are the implications of large natural climate variability in the past? http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/scientists-find-an-abrupt-warm-jog-after-a-very-long-cooling/?_r=1 …pic.twitter.com/HwQZ1BGZij
@DanaRohrabacher Why not ask NASA? About 3 million years ago, CO2 was naturally high (~400ppm) so Earth was warmer:https://twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin/status/293543457086124032 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.