@Mark_Brooks U ignore all arguments made by those many scientists who reject theory that man made CO2 is overriding Earth’s natural cycles
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@RickWoollams why don't you believe claims of 9/11 truthers Congressman? -
@HellerExposed have followed up on several claims and found them baseless, maybe others are more accurate, but I doubt it
-
@DanaRohrabacher Did you follow up by consulting national sci orgs like US NAS, or google until some website confirmed your preconceptions?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher Any advocate that relies principally on shills, front men and cranks has big issues. (1/2) -
@RickWoollams U ignore argument of those who disagree, thus they must have better case cause U R just calling names not refuting arguments -
.
@DanaRohrabacher I'm pointing you to the vast majority of experts: the APS, the AGU, the NAS. (And their intl brethren.) You?#deniers - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher In what other scientific discipline would you ignore the findings of the vast majority of those working in the field? 2/2 -
@RickWoollams Note:@DanaRohrabacher has disdain 4 US scientists when discussing climate science. Prefers old Russian mathematician and Tol -
.
@CallingLikeItIs@DanaRohrabacher They sound "sciency" and give him air cover.#deniers -
@RickWoollams mathematician & economist - about as sciency as@DanaRohrabacher gets. He gives away his motives here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2m9SNzxJJA&feature=youtu.be&t=2m1s … -
@RickWoollams "Draconian solutions"-@DanaRohrabacher mixes policy & science, and then turns to Cato oil shill. Watch whole video if you can
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Help America be Reagan's shining city on a hill; read US NAS factual case: http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/exec-office-other/climate-change-full.pdf … http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=19 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Yes, you keep claiming that "many" scientists disagree but can't address the factual case made by US NAS,NASA,AIP,AMS,AGU..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.