@Mark_Brooks many drugs & chemicals could help general health by adding them 2 water supply thus force feeding public=destroys freedom
@RickWoollams why do so many AGW advocates tout support from organizations rather than make case that CO2 caused planet to warm?
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher You ignore the scientists but want science from random citizens on Twitter? What's wrong with you?#deniers -
@RickWoollams perhaps AGW advocates,rather than denigrate many prominent opposing scientists, should agree to debates & answer challenges -
.
@DanaRohrabacher How do you think the physicists at the APS and the scientists at the NAS came to their conclusions? Flipping a coin? -
@RickWoollams how do U think those many scientists who disagree with Man made CO2 creates Global warming theory came to their conclusions -
.
@DanaRohrabacher The percentage of working climate scientists who disagree with the fundamentals is very very small.#deniers -
@RickWoollams I think any advocate who keeps claiming how many others agree does’t have a good factual or logical case to make -
@DanaRohrabacher@RickWoollams why don't you believe claims of 9/11 truthers Congressman? -
@HellerExposed have followed up on several claims and found them baseless, maybe others are more accurate, but I doubt it
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher You ignore US NAS, NASA,NOAA, AIP,AMS, etc. making the case that CO2 caused planet to warm, but ask a layman to do so. Why? -
@DumbSci numerous prominent scientists who disagree R more qualified than me. I’d be happy to debate Al Gore, but he won’t do public debate -
@DanaRohrabacher "numerous prominent scientists" also disagree about evolution, like Dr. Spencer. Does that mean we should ignore US NAS?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.