@DanaRohrabacher What govt control RU referring to? Do u oppose regulations to protect our environment, food, cars, etc?
@Mark_Brooks U ignore all arguments made by those many scientists who reject theory that man made CO2 is overriding Earth’s natural cycles
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher No, the *US NAS* rejects all those fractally wrong, incoherent "arguments": http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=19 …pic.twitter.com/toY23DDPFi
-
.
@DumbSci@CallingLikeItIs@DanaRohrabacher Congressman, why do all major science organizations disagree with you?#deniers -
@RickWoollams why do so many AGW advocates tout support from organizations rather than make case that CO2 caused planet to warm? -
.
@DanaRohrabacher You ignore the scientists but want science from random citizens on Twitter? What's wrong with you?#deniers -
@RickWoollams perhaps AGW advocates,rather than denigrate many prominent opposing scientists, should agree to debates & answer challenges -
.
@DanaRohrabacher How do you think the physicists at the APS and the scientists at the NAS came to their conclusions? Flipping a coin? -
@RickWoollams how do U think those many scientists who disagree with Man made CO2 creates Global warming theory came to their conclusions -
.
@DanaRohrabacher The percentage of working climate scientists who disagree with the fundamentals is very very small.#deniers - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.