Scientists Dr Richard Tol , Dr. Nor Shaviv, Dr. Nicola Scafetta among many misrepresented as supporting IPCC AGW conclusions part of 97%lie
@DistantOcean all I know is he says he was misrepresented, that he did not support conclusions of IPCC report
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher "...climate change is caused by humans. I have very little reason to doubt that the consensus is indeed correct." (2/2) -
@DistantOcean there have been cycles, droughts, hurricanes, tornadoes, moving glaciers & ice caps, hot spells&cold ones long before humans -
@DanaRohrabacher No kidding? Call the NAS right away and let them know. Or, explain this: http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=19 …pic.twitter.com/xLMvjl5km8
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher 12% of authors said their papers had lower endorsement, but 50% rated their own papers HIGHER:pic.twitter.com/J4A2qdkJVO
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Cook et al. ranked abstracts AND surveyed authors to check for misrepresentations. Result 97% vs 97% http://www.skepticalscience.com/Consensus-Project-self-rating-data-now-available.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher Tol: "There is no doubt in my mind that the literature on climate change overwhelmingly supports the hypothesis..." (1/2)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.