@CallingLikeItIs Not wrong, but even if I was, only Fanatics claim people who believe in what they R advocating R liars if they R wrong.
@DumbSci if Someone promotes the arrogant lie that 97% of all scientists agree with AGW theory, then I guess that person lacks credibility
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher if Someone promotes arrogant lie that 97% of scientists DISagree with AGW, then that person lacks credibility@DumbSciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Cook et al., Doran & Zimmerman, Anderegg et al., NASA, NOAA: ~97% of papers taking a position (& active pub cli sci) agree. -
@DumbSci the 97% claim & use of words like denier part of an arrogant suppression of honest debate. -
@DanaRohrabacher@DumbSci please go to http://climate.nasa.gov/consensus . Do you trust NASA? -
@sugarcone4 let’s see, didn’t NASA’s top scientist put out a graph that eliminated any indication of the mini Ice Age? So some good some bad -
@DanaRohrabacher The folks@nasa@EarthVitalSigns have evidence of#climatechange. http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ Acting is conservative thing to do -
@timreckmeyer earth’s climate constantly changing 4 millions of years. The question is whether or not today’s change due to man-made CO2 -
@DanaRohrabacher USA & Russian sci acads say most of it is. This conclusion is BASED on changes in millions of years of paleoclimate data. -
@DumbSci oh yes, & 97% all scientists agree with U. Baloney. Cycles reflect massive impact of Solar activity, not microscopic level of CO2 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.