@caerbannog666 it's been 2 years, I think the right word is "skeptical" & even more that person is a climate sci @DumbSci @DanaRohrabacher
@caerbannog666 while waiting 4 my staff to find specific names Y don’t U google names of Ru Aca members & see their position on AGW
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Well I did find 1 "skeptic" RAS member (K Abdusamatov). Google Scholar returns 2 relevant papers, total of 2 citations. 1/2 -
@caerbannog666 let me get this straight U checked the RAS. U found what U call a AGW skeptic. Did U find any scientists who agreed with U? -
@DanaRohrabacher Sure did. Found several RAS members on the IPCC author list. They all have far more pubs/citations than your lone skeptic. -
@caerbannog666 Russian scientists I spoke to skeptical about AGW, not IPCC research. They had graphs showing world in cooling cycle. -
@DanaRohrabacher U saw "graphs" & just believed. Yet 2014 warmest year and 2015 even warmer so far. Who are "they"?1 name??@caerbannog666 -
@CallingLikeItIs recognizing AGW as bogus nothing to do with Russian graphs. Arrogant claims like 97% & failed predictions enough -
@DanaRohrabacher wrong again. so where's the graphs and names? Amazing how u base policy off of pure opinion -
@DanaRohrabacher hmm u said, "skeptical about AGW, not IPCC research" begs the q - have U even read recent IPCC report?@caerbannog666
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.