@CallingLikeItIs so U claim less than 1/2 of 10 of 1 percent is not minuscule. And that vast majority of it natural not significant
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@CallingLikeItIs When it comes to changing the atmosphere's optical properties, "1/2 of 10 of 1 percent" isn't minuscule.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caerbannog666
@caerbannog666 how about comparing CO2 to other factors like solar activity. CO2 has minuscule impact Solar activity is a dominating factor2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher If solar activity is responsible for the observed warming, then why is the stratosphere *cooling*?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @caerbannog666
@caerbannog666 The earth has always had warming & cooling cycles. The slight warming since end of mini ice age in 1850s no cause for alarm2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher That didn't answer the question. Again, if solar activity, not CO2, drives warming, then why is the stratosphere cooling?5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @caerbannog666
@caerbannog666 tell me if stratosphere is cooling wouldn’t that contradiction the predictions that CO2 makes earth warmer, doesn’t heat rise10 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@caerbannog666 no wonder you cry fraud, you don't understand even the most basic factors about climate change4 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@tonydunc Am getting your drift. What about the other pollutants? Why r they focusing on CO2. Who's behind it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.