@DanaRohrabacher Ever figure out Ur math mistake? What % of CO2 is man-made? also 2.What would Earth's temp be with no CO2? @caerbannog666
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher has better access to science than most. He ought to take advantage of the opportunity, not be a luddite.@caerbannog666 -
@SouBundanga this long tweet history & other where
@DanaRohrabacher misrepresented Russian Acad of Sci worthy of a blog post@caerbannog666 -
@CallingLikeItIs so have U met with leaders from the Russian Academy? Which ones? Did they tell U they endorsed the conclusions of the IPCC -
.
@DanaRohrabacher@CallingLikeItIs All the experts at NASA, but he had to go to Russia to find a climate science denier. Desperation plus! -
@SouBundanga worse, not a climate scientist and
@DanaRohrabacher misrepresented 1 person to mean entire Russian Acad, which endorses IPCC -
@CallingLikeItIs Who is it U have spoken to in the leadership of the Russian Academy? Have u met anyone in the Russian Academy of science? -
@DanaRohrabacher Seriously? U said person who signed 2005 IPCC endorsement - that person is not a climate scientist.If I'm wrong, correct me -
@DanaRohrabacher Now the facts: Russian Academy of Sci on record endorsing IPCC. You are misrepresenting that fact because of 1 denier U met
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher@caerbannog666 Dana, how long do you think you will be able to get away with playing that stupid? -
@TenneyNaumer@DanaRohrabacher@caerbannog666 Rather stupid for vice-chair to publicly expose ignorance about basic 5th grade level science -
@Ceist8 notice name calling is so often reply to points I make, verifying often exchanging tweeter views with politicos posing as scientists -
@DanaRohrabacher Stop deflecting & trying to smear. Back on point, do U now know that stratospheric cooling was predicted with AGW@Ceist8 -
@CallingLikeItIs@DanaRohrabacher@Ceist8 Here's a prediction of CO2-induced stratospheric cooling *from 1967*:http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/04/18/stratospheric-cooling/ … -
@caerbannog666 oh yes, 1967 was when the science establishment preached global cooling before switching to global warming -
@DanaRohrabacher You're talking Time magazine not science, lol. Read the science and show some intellectual curiosity@caerbannog666
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher No contradiction. Basic physics of greenhouse effect. How can you not know the basic science, yet hold the purse strings? -
@Ceist8 maintaining faith in a theory when predictions based on it aren’t happening is fanaticism. -
Ignoring science all the evidence because of ignorant ideology is fanaticism
-
when Prominent scientist rejects Global Warming Theory his reasoning ignored & personal attacks begin, honest discussion thwarted
-
By 'prominent scientist' you mean a dentist?
-
Like who? Find one who rejects the even the basic physics of the greenhouse effect like you do.
-
Find any that have published valid evidence-based research.
-
overseas & a bit busy.Will send U a few names & studies when I get back. If U R open-minded U might Google & U’ll find lots of them
- 16 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.