@DanaRohrabacher A co-author of the 97% paper you say is fraudulent wants to discuss the matter with you on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3ehwqz/iama_congressman_dana_rohrabacher_for_californias/ctfd5v8 …
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I tell you that one of the 97% paper co-authors would like 2 talk 2 you & you change the subject. Why won't you engage him?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher now you're outright lying. Russian Academy of Science endorses IPCC. http://nationalacademies.org/onpi/06072005.pdf …@caerbannog666 -
@CallingLikeItIs spoke directly 2 head of Russian Academy who claimed his name only meant verifying IPCC report research not the conclusions -
@DanaRohrabacher read my link where name is signed. You're avoiding your lie with a squirmy answer -
@DanaRohrabacher you said "Russian academy of Science believes" Should've said "I talked to a guy and he claimed" BIG diff! You write a lie -
@CallingLikeItIs I have had numerous meetings with Rus Sci Acad. After ignoring all the AGW shenanigans be careful who U call liar -
@DanaRohrabacher@CallingLikeItIs When it comes to climate-scientists, why do you trust Russians more than your fellow Americans? -
@caerbannog666 nothing to do with trust. RU ACADEMY of SCI shows falsity of claims 97% of scientists & all academies agree with AGW theory -
@DanaRohrabacher shows nothing of the kind. Shows politician resorting to cherry picking the 3% to support conspiracy theory@caerbannog666
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.