@DanaRohrabacher Your treatment of @GinaEPA Thursday was shameful, wrongheaded, misleading, ignorant, and rude. An insult to voters.
@windoverthelea I have asked that question of Scientists & never been told it was inappropriate. instead of calling names challenge facts
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher To what ? were you referring? As for challenging facts, I'd rather challenge faulty, partisan rhetoric. Facts are facts. -
@DanaRohrabacher I think it's partisan to treat scientific facts as debatable opinions. What will it take for GOP to recognize the truth? -
@windoverthelea debate not about CO2 level but that gov regulator didn’t know even though pushing policies based on importance of that level -
@DanaRohrabacher Maybe the exact # slipped her mind. Maybe she got her wires crossed after hostile interrogations and stumbled. .... -
@windoverthelea go back and watch it again. I went out of my way to complement her and to put forward my question in a respectful way -
@DanaRohrabacher Have to disagree there. Those who claim GOP treats EPA w/respect (inc. deference to science/their expertise) is misguided.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher And if you'll read carefully, you'll notice I never once called you a name.#wordsmatter -
@DanaRohrabacher Attacked? Or expressed offense at your hostility during the hearing? The difference in tone b/t the parties was remarkable.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.