Dear @danarohrabacher: NASA strongly endorses the 97% global-warming consensus. This is from http://climate.nasa.gov :pic.twitter.com/eSlY6W8y5A
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@caerbannog666 claiming 97% scientists agree with man-made global warming theory undermines the credibility of any other argument U use
@DanaRohrabacher It's not just me. NASA is making the 97% claim, front and center, at http://climate.nasa.gov . Take a look & see 4 yourself.
@caerbannog666 @DanaRohrabacher Anything from NASA now needs to be viewed with great suspicion. Way too much dis-information.
@aldavidson99 You are absolutely right. Will you join me in calling for @DanaRohrabacher to investigate the NASA Moon-landing hoax?
@caerbannog666 @DanaRohrabacher Investigations into NASA GISS & NOAA NCDC temperature record adjustment & homogenization are long overdue.
@aldavidson99 @DanaRohrabacher I conducted my own temperature data investigation. Results here: http://forums.utsandiego.com/showpost.php?p=5337377&postcount=222 … Tell me what u think.
@caerbannog666 @DanaRohrabacher Your input data was pre-adjusted. See faked adjustment by BOM Australia identified at http://www.joannenova.com.au
@aldavidson99 @DanaRohrabacher Do you know what input data-set I used?
@caerbannog666 @DanaRohrabacher Your post says it's NOAA GHCN raw and adjusted data. GHCN "raw" data is clearly not unadjusted.
@DanaRohrabacher @caerbannog666 gee, we heard that from the tobacco companies as well.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj0PYdl99tI …
@DanaRohrabacher @caerbannog666 No it doesn't. But people who think clearing rainforests would reduce atmospheric CO2 are easily confused.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.