@CallingLikeItIs get over it: that claim shows AGW fraud . 2 be correct global temp determination need be accurate to 1 hundredth of degree
@SninkyPoo do U use same approach with the many scientists who disagree with U on AGW?What if one offered U book refuting every point U make
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher then call a scientist. Start with Gavin Schmidt - our tax dollars pay him so you might as well learn from him @SninkyPoo -
@CallingLikeItIs GR8 suggestion!@DanaRohrabacher here's his@NASA page: http://www.giss.nasa.gov/staff/gschmidt/#climatechange -
@SninkyPoo No response from
@DanaRohrabacher indicates, as expected, that he doesnt want to learn & not discussing in good faith@NASA -
@CallingLikeItIs @SninkyPoo@NASA I tried 2 engage@DanaRohrabacher in a good-faith discussion about temp data here:https://twitter.com/caerbannog666/status/568236497444343808 … -
@caerbannog666@CallingLikeItIs@NASA@DanaRohrabacher OMG. And WOW. Talk about stick-to-it-ive-ness! (Or however it's spelled.) :-) -
@SninkyPoo If
@DanaRohrabacher is truly interested in science, "fraud" topic ends with chart@caerbannog666@NASApic.twitter.com/Ek4ppmgTf6
-
@CallingLikeItIs@DanaRohrabacher@caerbannog666@NASA I can't resist quoting Sheldon Cooper: BAZINGA! :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @SninkyPoo You mean like the willie soon gate fiasco ??? yeah those scientists. right???Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @SninkyPoo name one that is not Fred Singer, Bjeonr Lomborg neither is under directdeposit of the heartland instituteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher BTW, sir, I neglected to say - THANK YOU for actually engaging on Twitter. That's awesome! Most members of Congress don't.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.