@DanaRohrabacher be careful with fraud term, all cases being won by scientists when term used. What does that tell you?
@CColose why R U & other AGW Advocates so worried about having experts verify facts about the numbers being used in the AGW debate?
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher no one is worried, it's already been done countless times. Just pointing out the distractions by fake skeptics like you. -
@CColose there is nothing fake about my skepticism. The frantic reaction to suggesting a hearing indicates a hearing is needed, -
@DanaRohrabacher reaction not to useless hearing as much to Ur consistent & incorrect use of word fraud + shock @ Ur sci ignorance@CColose -
@CallingLikeItIs some people call others ignorant others call people arrogant I will try to refrain -
@DanaRohrabacher but you didn't :) Bsides, my point is concern. You don't understand sci & show 1-way skepticism, yet on Science Committee
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@CColose Sir- experts already weighed in. Even#Pentagon "believes" them. There is no debate on#climatechange -Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.