@CallingLikeItIs get over it: that claim shows AGW fraud . 2 be correct global temp determination need be accurate to 1 hundredth of degree
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher be careful with fraud term, all cases being won by scientists when term used. What does that tell you?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallingLikeItIs
@CallingLikeItIs U seem adamantly opposed 2 questioning authority. I prefer to see if what is advocate makes sense & deals with objections2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher difference btwn skepticism & pseudo-skepticism. All for skepticism, but diff from crying fraud based on debunked blog post.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CallingLikeItIs
@CallingLikeItIs so-called pros will be able to testify why temp level readings were altered. Only fanatics would oppose this.6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
Opposing wasting time & patience of scientists & congress with baseless accusations is hardly fanaticism
@DanaRohrabacher@CallingLikeItIs1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
Adjustments go both ways & net is too small to justify the alleged chicanery; the accusation is ludicrous on its face
@DanaRohrabacher1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher if you move weather station 1 mile higher up, and it records much colder temps, what is ur interpretation of data?@mtobis2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.