@DanaRohrabacher @grngamine That's wrong. I provide proof that data isn't altered to show warming,right at this link: http://forums.utsandiego.com/showpost.php?p=5321822&postcount=18 …
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I'm conservative but frustrated conservative leaders not in discussion. Too busy denying science. 2014 warmest, get over it -
@CallingLikeItIs get over it: that claim shows AGW fraud . 2 be correct global temp determination need be accurate to 1 hundredth of degree -
@DanaRohrabacher be careful with fraud term, all cases being won by scientists when term used. What does that tell you? -
@CallingLikeItIs U seem adamantly opposed 2 questioning authority. I prefer to see if what is advocate makes sense & deals with objections -
@DanaRohrabacher difference btwn skepticism & pseudo-skepticism. All for skepticism, but diff from crying fraud based on debunked blog post. -
@CallingLikeItIs so-called pros will be able to testify why temp level readings were altered. Only fanatics would oppose this. -
Opposing wasting time & patience of scientists & congress with baseless accusations is hardly fanaticism
@DanaRohrabacher@CallingLikeItIs -
@mtobis baseless accusations? you trust the data I do not. We will see if what they say under oath - 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher in short, yes. It's simple physics. Read without bias. You fear policy so ignore science. But science obvious, policy notThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.