.@DanaRohrabacher, we need leaders who will #ActOnClimate, not deny the science.https://www.barackobama.com/climate-change-deniers/dana-rohrabacher-california/ …
-
-
Earths atmosphere is overloaded w/ heat-trapping carbon dioxide &
@DanaRohrabacher is talking about polar bears@globalwarming@SaintAubinN -
@grngamine overloaded? CO2 minuscule & inconsequential:less than 1\2 of 1/10 of 1 Percent of atmosphere. 90 o/o of it is result of nature
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @grngamine That's wrong. I provide proof that data isn't altered to show warming,right at this link: http://forums.utsandiego.com/showpost.php?p=5321822&postcount=18 … -
@caerbannog666 AGW advocates have been cooking the books a& altering data so U don’t know if Ur data is valid -
@DanaRohrabacher I got the temperature data directly from the NOAA web-site. Are you suggesting that NOAA scientists are falsifying data? -
@caerbannog666 U seem unaware of latest revelation of data manipulation. NASA reported higher temp than what was record at weather stations -
@DanaRohrabacher If you have evidence that NASA manipulated temperature data, why don't you show it to@ClimateOfGavin, NASA/GISS director? -
@caerbannog666 expect there to be congressional hearings into NASA altering weather station data to falsely indicate warming & sea rise -
@DanaRohrabacher you have to live/die with legacy of being stupid and careless. History will have 20/20 hindsight@mtobis@caerbannog666 -
@CallingLikeItIs Global Warming fanatics, based on CO2 theory, made ominous predictions that never materialized. History is judging them now - 21 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Bull. You lying doesn't equal truth. Statistical adjustments aren't manipulation.#EcoNuremberg @grngamine -
.
@DanaRohrabacher No, oil's prostitute, greenhouse effect is fact, not theory. Effects clearly measurable.#EcoNuremberg
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @grngamine could you clarify? which AGW advocates? or is that a euphemism for scientific experts? -
@DanaRohrabacher and if you find no conspiracy?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @grngamine Besides...not being able to validate data *is* denying science.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @grngamine and this said journalists expert field is? Right not science but selling stories.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.