@timreckmeyer so a survey of 68 old studies said something. Of the ones predicting warming how any predicted 18 yrs of flat temp?
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher +We agree on GH effect. CO2@400ppm (highest in 650k yrs). Obs temps up and ocean pH down. If not CO2 then what is cause?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @timreckmeyer
@timreckmeyer CO2, a micro a part of atmosphere,has minimal impact on climate. & humans contribute only a small proportion of that CO23 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer I hope this is simple enough to understand "CO2-Ink Demonstration" Youtube video http://youtu.be/81FHVrXgzuA1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher Every single national scientific academy in the world accepts the AGW science. Why don't you? $?pic.twitter.com/J1n3Or44k3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher Really is that the#Russian Academy of Sciences official position on AGW?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher When did you start trusting the Russian Academy over our own? Just curious.@mwt20082 replies 1 retweet 3 likes
@rob_honeycutt whoever it is that we trust we should always verify...or at least question.
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@rob_honeycutt Crious how easily trust is bestowed. Are human beings so lazy they'll accept the word (tweet) of a stranger?0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.