bet @DanaRohrabacher will take those odds // Less than a 1-in-27 million chance Earth's record hot streak is naturalhttp://mashable.com/2015/01/16/2014-earth-warmest-year-not-random/ …
@timreckmeyer CO2, a micro a part of atmosphere,has minimal impact on climate. & humans contribute only a small proportion of that CO2
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Humans have increased CO2 levels by 40% since the 19th Century.@timreckmeyer -
@ClimateOfGavin human contribution to CO2 level is between 10 & 20 percent. CO2 is less than 1/2 of 1/10 of 1 percent of atmosphere -
@DanaRohrabacher Basic arithmetic. Before: ~280ppm. Now: ~400ppm. Our contribution: 120/400=30%. Increase=120/280=43%. -
@ClimateOfGavin numerous scientists testify human contribution to CO2 level is between 10 and 20%. CO2 is minuscule part of atmosphere -
Tweet unavailable
-
@jqbalter Ur language undermines serious consideration of the points U make. It certainly reflects Ur level of intelligence . -
Tweet unavailable
-
@jqbalter Y R U presenting Ur disagreement in such an arrogant &stupid way? Come on Ur capable of at least trying 2 refute rather call names - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer I hope this is simple enough to understand "CO2-Ink Demonstration" Youtube video http://youtu.be/81FHVrXgzuA -
@mwt2008 R there 30 percent fewer penguins? Ice covered earth. Then began retreat as global temp went up. Humans played no role& still don’t -
@DanaRohrabacher Every single national scientific academy in the world accepts the AGW science. Why don't you? $?pic.twitter.com/J1n3Or44k3
-
@mwt2008 every single one? Not when president of Russian Academy told me he rejected AGW theory & suggesting we R in global cooling cycle -
@DanaRohrabacher@mwt2008 the same Russian academy that once threw out modern biology and caused a mega-causualty famine as a consequence? -
@mgraalum nope, that was under a communist regime that insisted that all scientists sign on to specific theory...like the AGW folks today -
@DanaRohrabacher let me help here. You're Trofim Lysenko. -
@mgraalum OK then in that context those trashing those who disagree with AGW are Stalin & his KGB goons. Look, name calling anti-intelligent - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher then u do not agree in science of greenhouse effect. -
@timreckmeyer will look more closely before endorsing, but it may just be irrelevant when dealing with such a minuscule level of CO2 -
@DanaRohrabacher Thank you. If needed please reach out to@ClimateOfGavin of@NASAGISS
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.