bet @DanaRohrabacher will take those odds // Less than a 1-in-27 million chance Earth's record hot streak is naturalhttp://mashable.com/2015/01/16/2014-earth-warmest-year-not-random/ …
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher 2 cherry picks in one tweet. 18yrs and 1998 as starting point. pic.twitter.com/fw75cpHpMD@elijahion
-
@timreckmeyer remember predictions of Global Cooling. U start Ur calculation at low point of cycle that led to that error. -
@DanaRohrabacher + Vast majority predicted warming.pic.twitter.com/UAjRqhf5kJ
-
@timreckmeyer so a survey of 68 old studies said something. Of the ones predicting warming how any predicted 18 yrs of flat temp? -
@DanaRohrabacher Short term natural variations are included in the models. Observations prove models are skillful.http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2013/12/the-global-temperature-jigsaw/ … -
@timreckmeyer CO2 climate theory is based on computer modeling. Can’t help but notice those loading info into the computers Have an agenda -
@DanaRohrabacher U really think@NASAGISS and@NOAA have an agenda? Ouch. -
@timreckmeyer to be fair to@DanaRohrabacher,@NASAGISS@NOAA do have an agenda. but to promote knowledge, not the paranoid one he thinks. - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@elijahion If contributions influencing politicians stance on climate change should be put on trial...... -
@mwt2008 rad enviro orgs biggest contributors in town. those fanatics too stupid to refute opt to besmirch integrity of those who disagree -
@DanaRohrabacher Serious question did any fossil fuel or energy companies made a contribution to you election campaign? Received any funds? -
@mwt2008 Contributions 2 my campaign much more transparent than those who give 2 U. Fess up, who gives U $ 2 vilify those who disagree? -
@DanaRohrabacher I see u refuse 2 confirm or deny any fossil fuel/ energy company donations. Alas 1 may conclude another corrupt politician -
@mwt2008 is public record. Look & find I receive little PAC $ & I am one of poorest members, Relevant 2 name calling not 2 honest discussion -
@DanaRohrabacher Based in the UK (England) I have no idea where to look. Do you have any links? -
@mwt2008 I am an open book. Start with my web site, then to fed election commission, then Google my note my opposition to marihuana laws
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Don't ever waiver from the anti AGW path, Congressman. That is my advice to you.
@DanaRohrabacher@elijahion -
@gregladen I stick with beliefs till proven wrong. My belief AGW theory is fraud not had negative impact over 26 yrs of elections -
@DanaRohrabacher@gregladen If you think those sentences are connected, it implies you see electoral success as a kind of proof. -
@Kolyin no, just the opposite. Stupid detractors instead of arguing an issue suggests try to dismiss by how out of touch I am with Am people -
@DanaRohrabacher@gregladen Declaring the positions you don't like "stupid" is not a good way to impartially assess evidence. -
@Kolyin intelligent ppl can & do disagree. use of word stupid specifically aimed at those claiming more ppl agreeing the more valid Ur point -
@DanaRohrabacher@gregladen You were arguing science with scientists. Were they really arguing that? -
@Kolyin in Cong hearing format I was asking a specific question about percent of CO2 man made. That it is between 10 & 20 not controversial - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.