@maigreym likes polar bears, which R not headed to extinction, Walrus will adapt to this natural change in climate & has nothing to with CO2
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher#Globalwarming will cause massextinctions of species that can't adapt on short time scales http://is.gd/dDU2K@maigreym1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @timreckmeyer
@timreckmeyer climate cycle impacted specific animals& plants in past, current cycle might as well, but has nothing 2 do with man made CO21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher#research says 60% of world’s ecosystems r now degraded & extinction rate is now 100 to 1000 times higher than the past.2 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @timreckmeyer
@timreckmeyer OK name five animals made extinct by Manmade G Warming. I will look, but remember I don’t believe human CO2 controls temp12 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer Dana is a lowdown pimp for the fossil fuel industry. He's only in office to land a million $ job with them.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @VV4Change
@VV4Change Ur lib/left heroes in Cong all worth more than I. If U lack knowledge, Ur personal attacks R going to be nonsense.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher You're lining up those lobbyist jobs as we speak. You're all sellouts. Hope you literally get trapped in a#RevolvingDoor2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VV4Change
@VV4Change U R complaining 2 politico who raises less campaign $ than vast majority. Go attack Boxer & Pelosi who raise lots more than me4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher U R still whining because you're insane and don't believe 97% of scientists who attribute climate change to HUMANS? Psycho1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@VV4Change The 97% for year was proven bogus yet you still quote it. Ur vulgarity reflects Ur intelligence.
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@VV4Change Danafacts definition: Dana's opinion on a subject which requires no proof. Used often 2 invalidate proven facts1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher@VV4Change DR is as dirty and contentious and vicious towards democrats and PBO as anyone is DC, really is a bad guy0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.