@FaceRiperMonkey what an interesting way of dismissing arguments that you are unable to deal with. Guess failed CO2 predictions to hard 4 U
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher here is another source for you to read, not written by#KochBros http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaceRiperMonkey
@FaceRiperMonkey so a political appointee at NASA uses 97o/o. Even Presidents science advisor won’t defend this,yet another, bogus claim1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher I can keep this up all day. You've no right to advise on anything that is scientific in nature. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/may/28/global-warming-consensus-climate-denialism-characteristics …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaceRiperMonkey
@FaceRiperMonkey keep it up, U sent article confirming 97o/o figure based on analysis of respondents to a survey. bogus methodology3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher it doesn't matter what I send. You're of the Party Of No. You just deny anything that isn't Fox, Koch, or Breit...typical1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaceRiperMonkey
@FaceRiperMonkey guess some people R not intellectually up to a spirited issue discussion so they rely on personal jabs & abuses.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher just cite one source, just one.......and I'll give you a COOKIE!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaceRiperMonkey
@FaceRiperMonkey don’t need cookie, but Burt Rutan has a comprehensive analysis which includes an impressive source list. Google him4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
caerbannog666 Retweeted caerbannog666
@DanaRohrabacher@FaceRiperMonkey Last Feb, U asked me 2 rebut a Rutan claim. I wrote a rebuttal 4 U which U ignoredhttps://twitter.com/caerbannog666/status/436956180015902721 …caerbannog666 added,
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@caerbannog666 time constraints don’t permit me 2 see/read all I’m sent. Will look at Ur analysis of this one segment of Burt’s research
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.