@DanaRohrabacher still waiting for you to cite your sources Mr. Senator
@FaceRiperMonkey keep it up, U sent article confirming 97o/o figure based on analysis of respondents to a survey. bogus methodology
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher it doesn't matter what I send. You're of the Party Of No. You just deny anything that isn't Fox, Koch, or Breit...typical -
@FaceRiperMonkey guess some people R not intellectually up to a spirited issue discussion so they rely on personal jabs & abuses. -
@DanaRohrabacher actually Mr. Intellectually Stimulating all you do is refute ANYTHING I send you w/o citing any source. Hardly stimulating
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@FaceRiperMonkey No, the 97% figure is based on independent ratings of nearly 12,000 peer-reviewed journal paper abstracts. -
@caerbannog666 respondents 2 survey of selected scientists. A sham aimed at enforced conformity & stifling debate, as was “case closed” - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@FaceRiperMonkey The survey was only a backup confirmation of the 97% result from the analysis of those ~12,000 abstracts.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.