New 1:1 thread. @DanaRohrabacher Do you trust the science of the greenhouse effect?
@timreckmeyer I trust they can. I do not trust that they have correctly analyzed the data.
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Thank u 4 direct answer. Do u agree NOAA/Mauno Loa monthly ave CO2 #'s/trends r accurate (see pic)?pic.twitter.com/1ORKeXJtsm
-
@timreckmeyer not studied that particular chart, but if asking do I acknowledge CO2 increase,yes.& increase continues yet temp stays level -
@DanaRohrabacher We agree in GH effect & that GHG CO2 is increasing. Do u agree CO2/CH4 highest it's been since 0 AD?pic.twitter.com/6vDjU3ICuY
-
@timreckmeyer not studied enough to confirm that, but no surprise 2 me if certain geologic cycles went back far. -
@DanaRohrabacher (1/2) Just an FYI. CO2 way above historical norms & rapidly increasing (A3 - pg740#NCA2014).pic.twitter.com/YeU6cNhrog
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer who do you trust to properly analyze the data??Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.