New 1:1 thread. @DanaRohrabacher Do you trust the science of the greenhouse effect?
@rdegucht baloney, if one expects an accurate answer one has to define what is being asked. Clinton was being deceptive to cover wrong doing
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher the question was unambiguous. You still refuse to answer.@sschwarz07@timreckmeyer -
@rdegucht no dodge. what science not specified in Question. Green house research may focus on one or two so-called green house gases -
.
@danarohrabacher The question was do you trust the science of the green house effect? Answer should be Yes or No.@sschwarz07@timreckmeyer -
@rdegucht Yes or no? “The science” get serious. That can mean any number of things depending on what scientist is talking. -
.
@danarohrabacher OK, do you agree with your National Academy of Sciences statement? http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782&page=21 … last §@sschwarz07@timreckmeyer
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.