@timreckmeyer demand that only scientists who U agree with can be believed or Ur anti-science is typical arrogant closed minded GWarming way
@sockrateaser U & other advocates of GWarming ignore large number of prominent scientists who have had the courage to oppose the herd
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher sounds like classic confirmation bias. A small number of of scientist back your original conclusion, (1) -
@sockrateaser so U decide truth by counting which side has more advocates, is Y GWarmers always claiming how many support their theory has -
@DanaRohrabacher the truth is not a democracy, nor do I claim it is. I do, however, default to believing the scientific consensus ...(1) -
@DanaRohrabacher ...over a small group of politicians and advocates with obvious ideological motivation to reject the science. (2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@sockrateaser looks like the herd is fed up with DR and his views so look out for the stampede, the herd is readyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.