@timreckmeyer No I refused to accept that U will determine the only alternative answers to that question
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher *amazing*-DoD, USGCRP, NOAA, NASA, AAAS, RAA, IMF, World Bank, WHO, 200+ Nat'l Acad's say#climatechange is real & a threat -
@timreckmeyer U certainly believe truth determine by the herd. y not argue truth of evidence like ice corps showed CO2 hike caused temp jump -
@DanaRohrabacher "herd"-Really? U bring that up w/@MichaelEMann when u talk 2 him - assume u r still that discussion on#climatechange -
@timreckmeyer I look forward to asking him about his selectivity in putting data into climate models & choice of grafts & mini Ice Age -
.
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer Very disappointing Dana. Citing denialist talking points & myths belies good faith :-( -
@MichaelEMann@timreckmeyer@DanaRohrabacher started with "no warming in 16 years". if he believes that, why? 2000's warmest, 2010 warmer. -
@arthursmith so earth temp has not remained flat for last 16yrs? That is fairly wide accepted. Hansen said change so minuscule meaningless -
@DanaRohrabacher "flat?" Was the Dow flat the last 8 years? Temps go up and down like stocks; trend is what matters, and that is positive.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer good thing people who understand it better than the entire scientific community serving are in congress! -
@sockrateaser U & other advocates of GWarming ignore large number of prominent scientists who have had the courage to oppose the herd -
@DanaRohrabacher sounds like classic confirmation bias. A small number of of scientist back your original conclusion, (1) -
@sockrateaser so U decide truth by counting which side has more advocates, is Y GWarmers always claiming how many support their theory has -
@DanaRohrabacher the truth is not a democracy, nor do I claim it is. I do, however, default to believing the scientific consensus ...(1) -
@DanaRohrabacher ...over a small group of politicians and advocates with obvious ideological motivation to reject the science. (2)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer Specifically what in the scientific data leads to your conclusion that the evidence is flawed? -
@PatrickDallas failure of predictions of major Global temp jump means GW theory wrong. -
@DanaRohrabacher Google "climate change escalator." When scientists say "It's about the endpoints u choose," they are following the data.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer ENGAGEMENT What r u doing to help Newport Beachhttp://www.ocregister.com/articles/sea-607305-rise-level.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.