@timreckmeyer Add to options, expose GWarming fraud so future generations not left with $trillions more in debt by economy killing rules
@timreckmeyer Ur claim that the scientists u believe must be accepted or one is rejecting science is, yes, arrogant. Why not try an issue
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher My issue is that u put US economy, kids & military @ grave risk b/c u choose 2 not look @ body of#climatechange evidence -
@timreckmeyer I have looked at the so-called evidence and found it flawed, But GW advocates won’t engage in Issue focused discussion -
@DanaRohrabacher *amazing*-DoD, USGCRP, NOAA, NASA, AAAS, RAA, IMF, World Bank, WHO, 200+ Nat'l Acad's say#climatechange is real & a threat -
@timreckmeyer U certainly believe truth determine by the herd. y not argue truth of evidence like ice corps showed CO2 hike caused temp jump -
@DanaRohrabacher "herd"-Really? U bring that up w/@MichaelEMann when u talk 2 him - assume u r still that discussion on#climatechange -
@timreckmeyer I look forward to asking him about his selectivity in putting data into climate models & choice of grafts & mini Ice Age -
.
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer Very disappointing Dana. Citing denialist talking points & myths belies good faith :-( - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer The *real* arrogance is pretending u somehow know better than virtually every real scientist on the planet. -
@PatrickDallas that’s because Ur contention that virtually all scientists agree with you about GWarming is dead wrong -
@DanaRohrabacher I don't know how you can say that. Every survey agrees w me. Every scientific body as well. Are they all lying?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.