@timreckmeyer I try to answer Qs directly. To suggest my position on GWarming not clear is ridiculous
@timreckmeyer baloney, “not trusting science” was your designation for those who disagree. Perhaps U can see that dismissal is arrogant
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher#false. "not trusting science" = u not trusting/accepting USGCRP (& others) w/ their#climatechange findings & acting (1/2) -
@timreckmeyer Ur claim that the scientists u believe must be accepted or one is rejecting science is, yes, arrogant. Why not try an issue -
@DanaRohrabacher My issue is that u put US economy, kids & military @ grave risk b/c u choose 2 not look @ body of#climatechange evidence -
@timreckmeyer I have looked at the so-called evidence and found it flawed, But GW advocates won’t engage in Issue focused discussion -
@DanaRohrabacher *amazing*-DoD, USGCRP, NOAA, NASA, AAAS, RAA, IMF, World Bank, WHO, 200+ Nat'l Acad's say#climatechange is real & a threat -
@timreckmeyer U certainly believe truth determine by the herd. y not argue truth of evidence like ice corps showed CO2 hike caused temp jump -
@DanaRohrabacher "herd"-Really? U bring that up w/@MichaelEMann when u talk 2 him - assume u r still that discussion on#climatechange -
@timreckmeyer I look forward to asking him about his selectivity in putting data into climate models & choice of grafts & mini Ice Age - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer Ur sources do not come to their conclusions based on science but rather they rationalize their conclusionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.