@TwoChambz @DanaRohrabacher He is qualified b/c of his triplets & they will have kids. Congressman - Question posed & would like an answer.
@timreckmeyer stating why those who disagrees R wrong is OK. Claiming they R anti-science is arrogant name calling, typical of GW advocates
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher#false. I make no such claim (in fact the opposite). U must have missed the tweet.pic.twitter.com/AMV7PpeCGg
-
@timreckmeyer baloney, “not trusting science” was your designation for those who disagree. Perhaps U can see that dismissal is arrogant -
@DanaRohrabacher#false. "not trusting science" = u not trusting/accepting USGCRP (& others) w/ their#climatechange findings & acting (1/2) -
@timreckmeyer Ur claim that the scientists u believe must be accepted or one is rejecting science is, yes, arrogant. Why not try an issue -
@DanaRohrabacher My issue is that u put US economy, kids & military @ grave risk b/c u choose 2 not look @ body of#climatechange evidence -
@timreckmeyer I have looked at the so-called evidence and found it flawed, But GW advocates won’t engage in Issue focused discussion -
@DanaRohrabacher *amazing*-DoD, USGCRP, NOAA, NASA, AAAS, RAA, IMF, World Bank, WHO, 200+ Nat'l Acad's say#climatechange is real & a threat -
@timreckmeyer U certainly believe truth determine by the herd. y not argue truth of evidence like ice corps showed CO2 hike caused temp jump - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer only arrogance is shown in Ur responses to factual comments 2 Ur baseless tweets. U have no solutionsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.