@TwoChambz @DanaRohrabacher He is qualified b/c of his triplets & they will have kids. Congressman - Question posed & would like an answer.
@timreckmeyer demand that only scientists who U agree with can be believed or Ur anti-science is typical arrogant closed minded GWarming way
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher good 2 know u think 200+ nat'l academies, USGCRP, NASA, NOAA, DoD r arrogant & close minded on#climatechange science -
@timreckmeyer stating why those who disagrees R wrong is OK. Claiming they R anti-science is arrogant name calling, typical of GW advocates -
@DanaRohrabacher#false. I make no such claim (in fact the opposite). U must have missed the tweet.pic.twitter.com/AMV7PpeCGg
-
@timreckmeyer baloney, “not trusting science” was your designation for those who disagree. Perhaps U can see that dismissal is arrogant -
@DanaRohrabacher#false. "not trusting science" = u not trusting/accepting USGCRP (& others) w/ their#climatechange findings & acting (1/2) -
@timreckmeyer Ur claim that the scientists u believe must be accepted or one is rejecting science is, yes, arrogant. Why not try an issue -
@DanaRohrabacher My issue is that u put US economy, kids & military @ grave risk b/c u choose 2 not look @ body of#climatechange evidence -
@timreckmeyer I have looked at the so-called evidence and found it flawed, But GW advocates won’t engage in Issue focused discussion - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer we don't call them anti science because we disagree we disagree because they rnt following rules of scienceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.