@TwoChambz @DanaRohrabacher He is qualified b/c of his triplets & they will have kids. Congressman - Question posed & would like an answer.
@timreckmeyer I try to answer Qs directly. To suggest my position on GWarming not clear is ridiculous
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Again u duck a very simple question. Please answer it directly. Where do you put your X?pic.twitter.com/mC2ZPdZdRA
-
@timreckmeyer Add to options, expose GWarming fraud so future generations not left with $trillions more in debt by economy killing rules -
@DanaRohrabacher Disappointed that you still ducked the question. -
@timreckmeyer No I refused to accept that U will determine the only alternative answers to that question -
@DanaRohrabacher your alternative of not trusting science is equivalent to an x on the first line. Doing so puts kids, nat'l sec @ risk. -
@timreckmeyer demand that only scientists who U agree with can be believed or Ur anti-science is typical arrogant closed minded GWarming way -
@DanaRohrabacher good 2 know u think 200+ nat'l academies, USGCRP, NASA, NOAA, DoD r arrogant & close minded on#climatechange science -
@timreckmeyer stating why those who disagrees R wrong is OK. Claiming they R anti-science is arrogant name calling, typical of GW advocates - 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@timreckmeyer DRs position on GW is quite clear facts have no place in the discussion whatever he believes is the truthThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.