Paging @DanaRohrabacher. Paging @DanaRohrabacher. Skeptical Science consensus paper voted ERL's best article of 2013 http://skepticalscience.com/SkS-consensus-paper-ERL-best-article-2013.html#.U1YRtdYsOa4.twitter …
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Wow. Saw a video which u said that via a verbal conversaion w/ Russia. Signed statement differs. http://www.nationalacademies.org/includes/G8+5energy-climate09.pdf … -
@mn4az I spoke directly to top scientists of Russian Academy in Moscow on several occasions. i didn’t get that through filter U use
-
@DanaRohrabacher But what they have signed directly contridicts what you say. -
@DanaRohrabacher That comment also puts u directly odds with the USGCRP. Don't know about u but I will trust USGCRP any day over Russia. -
@mn4az point is 97o/o figure supposedly included all scientists. large number of Russians obviously left out, as many more: number bogus
-
@DanaRohrabacher (1/2) Resarch paper shows Russians included. -
@mn4az I met them at least 4 times last ten years & they reject GWArming theory. Several accept research in IPCC not summary or conclusion
-
@DanaRohrabacher The G8+5 Acad's joint statmnt on#climatechange signed by Russian Acad of Sciences not agree w/ u http://www.nationalacademies.org/includes/G8+5energy-climate09.pdf … - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So you did collude with the GRU, aka the Russian Academy of Sciences? Awesome. Did you meet Ilya Slepnev there, by any chance?
@gchqThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.