Paging @DanaRohrabacher. Paging @DanaRohrabacher. Skeptical Science consensus paper voted ERL's best article of 2013 http://skepticalscience.com/SkS-consensus-paper-ERL-best-article-2013.html#.U1YRtdYsOa4.twitter …
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Bogus? It's a peer-reviewed survey of ~12K abstracts by 29K authors in 2K journals. Paper free at SKS link. Please read it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher 97% is bogus? How about "high 90s" instead? That's GOP hearing witness Richard Tol on the consensus: http://andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/richard-tols-fourth-draft/#comment-822 … -
@caerbannog666 Presidents science advisor, heads of NOAA & EPA, pro GW scientists, when asked not one would defend 97o/o-- so it is a lie -
@DanaRohrabacher Can U prove that the 97% paper is a lie? The 97% authors put their data at: http://www.skepticalscience.com/tcp.php?t=rate_papers … Let's see your results. -
@caerbannog666 major figures refuse to support 97o/o claim. That should tip U off as to lies that many advocates of GWarming support -
@DanaRohrabacher BTW, the 97% paper & data R on-line. A web-app makes it EZ 2 scrutinize the 97% data yourself. Link: http://www.skepticalscience.com/tcp.php?t=rate_papers …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@caerbannog666 DR you keep saying "bogus 97%". Peer reviewed papers for 97% r here. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus … Where's yours? -
@mn4az baloney. started out 97o/o of scientists now papers. Motive in heralding such nonsense is stifling debate, like yelling “Case Closed”
-
@DanaRohrabacher Not baloney... Data doesn't lie. U ducked my question. Where's your source? Provide it please. -
@mn4az U claim 97o/o of all scientists correct?was Russian Academy of Science, who oppose AGW theory, included? How all scientists contacted
-
@DanaRohrabacher Wow. Saw a video which u said that via a verbal conversaion w/ Russia. Signed statement differs. http://www.nationalacademies.org/includes/G8+5energy-climate09.pdf … -
@mn4az I spoke directly to top scientists of Russian Academy in Moscow on several occasions. i didn’t get that through filter U use
-
@DanaRohrabacher But what they have signed directly contridicts what you say. -
@DanaRohrabacher That comment also puts u directly odds with the USGCRP. Don't know about u but I will trust USGCRP any day over Russia. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@caerbannog666 What r u doing to help Newport Beach.http://www.ocregister.com/articles/sea-607305-rise-level.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.