@DanaRohrabacher #False-no questionaires. 97% is based on http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article … #climatechange is chance 4 u 2 lead. #leadforyourkids
@SpaceAvian GWarming advocates don’t ignore deficiencies, they try to prevent any mention of them by personally attacking those who disagree
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Climate denialists as victims was a predictable move, but scientific reality on the ground says: http://ow.ly/3juzVc -
@SpaceAvian move? we beg 4 issue based exchange but G Warming crowd never engages, simply finds something personally pejorative 2 reply -
@DanaRohrabacher ad hominem attacks aside, which issues would you like to sit down with the vast majority of the scientific community about? -
@SpaceAvian interested in production of water & energy. Committed to system to detect then deflect any major NEO threatening planet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher@SpaceAvian ur the only one ignoring facts. Cities in our district r preparing for realityhttp://www.ocregister.com/articles/sea-607305-rise-level.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Which magical “deficiencies” disprove 97% of all climate studies? Science thrives on legitimate criticism. This isn’t it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.