@DanaRohrabacher #False-no questionaires. 97% is based on http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article … #climatechange is chance 4 u 2 lead. #leadforyourkids
@mn4az it means when scientists move to stifle debate & a theory used to justify global gov, I demand proof & AGW theory doesn’t do it
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher But yet u do not read this science because u claim to not have time. This is unfortunate and unfair to your constituents. -
@mn4az GWarming crowd won’t engage, just tell U read. How about issue focus instead, like CO2 based predictions not happening=theory wrong
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher @mn4az My offer still stands Dana. Happy to talk w/ you about#climatechange. Let's set up a date & time. -
@MichaelEMann a 4 way discussion over a cup of coffee in DC or SoCal.. U pick a politico to join & I will bring a scientist, -
@DanaRohrabacher Cup of coffee in DC sounds good. Was thinking just one on one though. -
@MichaelEMann call DC office, will work scedule to find time good for four. -
@DanaRohrabacher will do Dana. Much thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.