@DanaRohrabacher Not a target mailing. NASA site references the 97% and sources after the statement: http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus …. Pls read it.
@mn4az GWarming advocates keep ignoring serious deficiencies in their theory Don’t expect help in applying what advocates refuse to defend.
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I guess this means u do not support national defense or our military.#climatechange viewed as nat'l security threat by DoD -
@mn4az it means when scientists move to stifle debate & a theory used to justify global gov, I demand proof & AGW theory doesn’t do it
-
@DanaRohrabacher But yet u do not read this science because u claim to not have time. This is unfortunate and unfair to your constituents. -
@mn4az GWarming crowd won’t engage, just tell U read. How about issue focus instead, like CO2 based predictions not happening=theory wrong
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher @mn4az My offer still stands Dana. Happy to talk w/ you about#climatechange. Let's set up a date & time. -
@MichaelEMann a 4 way discussion over a cup of coffee in DC or SoCal.. U pick a politico to join & I will bring a scientist, -
@DanaRohrabacher Cup of coffee in DC sounds good. Was thinking just one on one though. -
@MichaelEMann call DC office, will work scedule to find time good for four. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is why we can’t have nice planets. MT
@DanaRohrabacher: @mn4az GWarming advocates keep ignoring serious deficiencies in their theory -
@SpaceAvian GWarming advocates don’t ignore deficiencies, they try to prevent any mention of them by personally attacking those who disagree -
@DanaRohrabacher Climate denialists as victims was a predictable move, but scientific reality on the ground says: http://ow.ly/3juzVc -
@SpaceAvian move? we beg 4 issue based exchange but G Warming crowd never engages, simply finds something personally pejorative 2 reply -
@DanaRohrabacher ad hominem attacks aside, which issues would you like to sit down with the vast majority of the scientific community about? -
@SpaceAvian interested in production of water & energy. Committed to system to detect then deflect any major NEO threatening planet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @mn4az What is shameful is that an elected official would give priority to their ideology over well being of constituentsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.