@DanaRohrabacher (1/3) The Nat'l Climate Assessment (NCA) and just about every other legitamate science org on the planet disagrees with you
@mn4az if U make a point I consider it & respond, If tweeters send reading material I am less likely to have time 2 read, annualize & reply
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher How can u claim 2 "compare arguments" yet not read links 2 make sound decisions? Worried u r fed false intel.#Read4URKids -
@DanaRohrabacher U R being fed false talking points by@HeartlandInst (?) Pls read links about#climatechange 4 UR kids, then#Lead4URKids -
@DanaRohrabacher Act on#climatechange wil align u w/@DeptofDefense who view it as nat'l secrty threat. Punt@HeartlandInst &#Lead4URKids -
@DanaRohrabacher will u support@DeptofDefense & Admiral David Titley by leading on#climatechange?http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/03/31/time-for-real-leadership-on-climate-change-energy-national-security/ … -
@mn4az GWarming advocates keep ignoring serious deficiencies in their theory Don’t expect help in applying what advocates refuse to defend.
-
@DanaRohrabacher I guess this means u do not support national defense or our military.#climatechange viewed as nat'l security threat by DoD -
@mn4az it means when scientists move to stifle debate & a theory used to justify global gov, I demand proof & AGW theory doesn’t do it
-
@DanaRohrabacher But yet u do not read this science because u claim to not have time. This is unfortunate and unfair to your constituents. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @mn4az Interesting response DR when we make an argument u say prove It now when articles r posted as proof u won't read.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.