@DanaRohrabacher Not a target mailing. NASA site references the 97% and sources after the statement: http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus …. Pls read it.
@mn4az yes, they do that at times. Haven’t U ever watched a Congressional hearing?
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Watched Dr James Hansen & am upset that Congress isn't listening 2 him and the other 97%. Issue is an opp. for GOP 2 lead. -
@mn4az Hansen admitted, contrary 2 predictions,16 yrs of no real temp hike. Keep using bogus 97o/o reflects credibility of GWarming claims
-
@DanaRohrabacher Which organization do you trust to educate you on climate change: NIPCC or U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP)? -
@DanaRohrabacher Pls answer Q - Which org do u trust 2 educate u on climate change: NIPCC or U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP)? -
@mn4az I don’t trust anyone. I listen, compare arguements, & choose most believable proposition
-
@DanaRohrabacher @mn4az Does that mean we shouldn't trust u unless u provide convincing arguments. Oops cought in ur own BS
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Which scientific body do you trust to educate you on climate change: NIPCC or U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP)?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.