@mn4az So thousands of scientists who voice skepticism of GWarming theory don’t count? Instead focus should be specific disagreements
@mn4az pardon me. Restate question
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher NP. NASA site references 97% and sources: http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus …. My Q is in in picture below.pic.twitter.com/aStvXrnNPt
-
@mn4az gov agencies R run by pros & political appointees. Often they reference sources that R wrong. Congressional hearings often expose it
-
@DanaRohrabacher R U you suggesting NASA/NOAA climate scientists are referencing sources that R wrong? http://globalchange.gov/home.html -
@mn4az yes, they do that at times. Haven’t U ever watched a Congressional hearing?
-
@DanaRohrabacher Watched Dr James Hansen & am upset that Congress isn't listening 2 him and the other 97%. Issue is an opp. for GOP 2 lead. -
@mn4az Hansen admitted, contrary 2 predictions,16 yrs of no real temp hike. Keep using bogus 97o/o reflects credibility of GWarming claims
-
@DanaRohrabacher Which organization do you trust to educate you on climate change: NIPCC or U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP)? -
@DanaRohrabacher Pls answer Q - Which org do u trust 2 educate u on climate change: NIPCC or U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP)? - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @mn4az as a Klan tweeter, does DR (or his voting base) have similar views to Kansas shooter Frazier Glenn Cross?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.