@ademhen assuming something personally bad about others simply because they disagree reflects a closed mind or a lack of intelligence
@mn4az advocates describe how 97o/o reflects percent of responders to their questionnaire. tactic worked, focus not on challenges to theory
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher#False-no questionaires. 97% is based on http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/article …#climatechange is chance 4 u 2 lead.#leadforyourkids -
@mn4az So U believe 97o/o of all scientists support man made GWarming theory? &That this not guesstimate based on projecting from sample
-
@DanaRohrabacher 97% based on peer reviewed climate science papers on#climatechange. I believe.Have u read IOP URL or@NASA URL I provided? -
@mn4az if U make a point I consider it & respond, If tweeters send reading material I am less likely to have time 2 read, annualize & reply
-
@DanaRohrabacher How can u claim 2 "compare arguments" yet not read links 2 make sound decisions? Worried u r fed false intel.#Read4URKids -
@DanaRohrabacher U R being fed false talking points by@HeartlandInst (?) Pls read links about#climatechange 4 UR kids, then#Lead4URKids -
@DanaRohrabacher Act on#climatechange wil align u w/@DeptofDefense who view it as nat'l secrty threat. Punt@HeartlandInst &#Lead4URKids -
@DanaRohrabacher will u support@DeptofDefense & Admiral David Titley by leading on#climatechange?http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/03/31/time-for-real-leadership-on-climate-change-energy-national-security/ … - 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher I am describing what@NASA says. Are you suggesting that@NASA and the 13 agencies associated with the NCA is corrupt?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.