@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson as you say that asserted without evidence can be dismissed without, this is the NIPCC if you read both.
@JarlCarlson what NIPCC finding refuted? Dismissing without being specific or finding flaw in process instead of arguing issue not adequate
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson no rudeness no anger, just analysis.#icareaboutmychildrenThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson the physical basis for CC is well documented in IPCC report and almost every point in NIPCC is wrong#biasThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson the list of signatories doesn't have the required expertise to breed trust in process.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson NIPCC massively overstate the economic risks of reducing emissions (I have traded power so let's not go here)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson the NIPCC makes extraordinary claims on negative feedback, but is v. thin on evidence for the combinations.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson the two way cause-effect relationship between CO2 and temperature is not properly understood.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher @JarlCarlson the NIPCC report is full of straw man comparisons of IPCC report.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.