@DanaRohrabacher Your questions at today's Committee hearing show a stunning level of ignorance regarding climate and science in general.
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher@MFerrara37 You mean, only person to explain it to you via Twitter. Hundreds of experts have an explanation, Congressman. -
@cartoon_villain@MFerrara37 hundreds U ignore have a different explanation: CO2 miniscule part of atmosphere & has minor temp impact -
.
@DanaRohrabacher@MFerrara37 Please answer yes or no: did you read and understand the article I sent to you? -
@cartoon_villain@sschwarz07@CColose:@DanaRohrabacher is not interested in engaging in actual debate. Lets leave him to his fallacies. -
@MFerrara37@cartoon_villain@CColose@DanaRohrabacher The problem is that left alone his 14.5k followers hear only one side.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher@MFerrara37 "At least u tried" What are u implying?Did u construct alternate covariance matrix in your head while reading? -
@cartoon_villain@MFerrara37 As GW predictions fail overly complicated explanations offered but clearly natural forces at play so GW wrong -
@DanaRohrabacher@cartoon_villain@MFerrara37 Simplified explanations lead to incorrect conclusions. U r proof of that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.