@DanaRohrabacher Your questions at today's Committee hearing show a stunning level of ignorance regarding climate and science in general.
@MFerrara37 Assuming a high level of disagreement is a result of a low level of scientific literacy is a bit bold(or something similar)
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Your unsubstantiated "high level of disagreement" with 97% of experts in the field of climate science is more than bold. -
@MFerrara37 That means a large number of people, including GW advocates, know 97% figure is bogus & being used to silence debate -
@DanaRohrabacher The broad consensus of climate scientists is that the climate is changing & human actions play a role in that change.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@DanaRohrabacher@MFerrara37 Is it your opinion, Congressman, that you are an expert in the subject of climatology? -
@cartoon_villain@MFerrara37 I only claim 2 know what I don't know, which puts me a notch above know-it-all name calling GWarming advocates - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.