@ Alyssa3467 just opposite. Alarmists ignore Mini Ice Age then use 1850s, bottom of that decline, as baseline to claim temp increase since
@CerebralGuild So if facts don't support the agenda simply dismiss them as based on suspect data. Did not Iceland & Greenland refereeze?
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher plot population vs fossil fuels vs temp vs CO2 concentration and present a postulation based on science and not politics -
@CerebralGuild Didn't get your answer to the Iceland & Greenland freeze, suggesting dismal of Mini Ice Age as typical of GWarming advocates
-
@DanaRohrabacher @CerebralGuild Temps before the "Little Ice Age" are *still* cooler than current global temps, by the way. -
@Alyssa3467 @CerebralGuild I will check about temps being cooler before Mini Ice Age, still does not negate baseline choice as deceptive. -
@DanaRohrabacher @CerebralGuild Most other things I've seen go beyond that. -
@Alyssa3467 @CerebralGuild every time I make that challenge, it is ignored. If baseline is at low point, then warming impact exaggerated. -
@DanaRohrabacher @CerebralGuild People do the same thing w/ polar ice; choose most recent valley in sawtooth as baseline, & say ice growing -
@DanaRohrabacher @CerebralGuild The average is declining though. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher ?? likely cause of the sharp rise in global temp? you support a political agenda, I defer science based hypothesisThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.