@susanpai U sure know how to attack someone personally, even reaching back 2 decades.Does that mean U can't argue today's issues
@jlop117 comprehensive= one thing: legalizing status of those here illegally, which= a flood of new illegals & 50 million new poor residence
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher There will not be a flood of new illegals when you are preventing that by increasing border security! Common sense pls! -
@karinamanfru think rationally, giving a treasure to illegals = flood of new illegals=impossible to control border. It happened before.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher Comprhensive=fixing the over regulated, (many wickets) something you can run on by saying you deregulated IR with Marco. -
@jlop117 As Lon as it doesn't mean legalizing status of those here illegally, I will support making system more efficient -
@DanaRohrabacher why do you think your district is different then what 3/4 of the country believe that IR needs passage?#dontlie -
@jlop117 I've noticed made up numbers R often used to over estimate support for things like Amnesty and Global Warming. -
@DanaRohrabacher you don't believe Gallup, Fox News polls? -
@jlop117 please stipulate which poll, taken when& specific numbers -
@DanaRohrabacher please explain to me how widely your district is different from America? Can you cite any district polls? -
@jlop117 Voters at polls that count reeelected me with large majority 12 times. My illegal immigration views R well known & have not changed - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DanaRohrabacher you should conference with Jeff Denham your colleague, he agrees with 75% of Americans IRT immigration reformThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.