@donpedrodepedo No one guru. Most people Ur age have never examined other side. look at ice core issue,Warming comes before CO2 increases
-
-
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher i've a desire to entertain all sides, but i'm not finding reputable sources that conclusively negate gw...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @donpedrodepedo
@donpedrodepedo I recommend U get on Internet & track down Burt Rutan one of the worlds great Space & aeronautics engineers, he's great3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher what are the end goals for each side? Why do lib gov officials push gw and vice versa?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @donpedrodepedo
@donpedrodepedo During Clinton years getting fed research grant was made easy for those proving GWarming theory. now under Obama same game2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher but what is motivation for both sides? Obama uses gw to create more taxes to generate revenue?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @donpedrodepedo
@donpedrodepedo motives not important. accuracy of argument & significance of policy being advocated should be focus of decision making2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher it clear there are non science-based motivations. Just trying to figure out benefit of pushing gw1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @donpedrodepedo
@donpedrodepedo focus on merits of arguments not motive of one arguing the case. All this attempt to distract from lack of substance3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanaRohrabacher
@DanaRohrabacher more convincing. Just wondering what they have to gain by doing so1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@donpedrodepedo I certainly believe science compromised by with holding grants contrary to GW theory, but no proposition deserves dismissal
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.